Candice Swanepoel
Memorandum to Bernard Berelson (President, Population Council) found in “Activities Relevant to the Study of Population Policy for the U.S.” 3/11/69 by Frederick S. Jaffe (Vice president of Planned Parenthood - World Population).
TABLE 1. Examples of Proposed Measures to Reduce U.S. Fertility, by Universality or Selectivity of Impact
Universal Impact
Social Constraints
Selective Impact
Depending on Socio-Economic Status
Economic Deterrents
Measures Predicated on Existing Motivation to Prevent Unwanted Pregnancies
Social Controls
Restructure family:
a) Postpone or avoid marriage
b) Alter image of ideal family size
Compulsory education of children
Encourage increased homosexuality
Educate for family limitation
Fertility control agents in water supply
Encourage women to work
Modify tax policies:
a) Substantial marriage tax
b) Child Tax
c) Tax married more than single
d) Remove parents tax exemption
d) Additional taxes on parents with more than I or 2 children in school
Reduce/eliminate paid maternity leave or benefits
Reduce/eliminate children’s or family allowances
Bonuses for delayed marriage and greater child-spacing
Pensions for women of 45 with less than N children
Eliminate Welfare payments after first 2 children
Compulsory abortion of out-of-wedlock pregnancies
Compulsory sterilization of all who have two children except for a few who would be allowed three
Confine childbearing to only a limited number of adults
Stock certificate type permits for children
Housing Policies:
a) Discouragement of private home ownership
b) Stop awarding public housing based on family size
Payments to encourage sterilization
Payments to encourage contraception
Payments to encourage abortion
Abortion and sterilization on demand
Allow certain contraceptives to be distributed nonmedically
Improve contraceptive technology
Make contraception truly available and accessible to all
Improve maternal health care, with family planning a core element
Chronic Depression
Require women to work and provide few child care facilities
Limit/eliminate public-financed medical care, scholarships, housing, loans and subsidies to families with more than N children.
Source: “A Family Planning Perspectives Special Supplement” published by Planned Parenthood-World Population, NYC, NY, 1970.
SOURCE
http://cdn.abbyjohnson.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/jaffememo.pdf
To
any freethinking person, this call for American policy is what you
would expect to see in some despotic scifi movie or brutal third world
dictatorship. Of course, an education in the Info vs disinfo war awakens you to the
reality that the modern western world has been designed and controlled
to become a tyrannical despotic tyranny. We are seeing it unfold in
front of our eyes. It saddens me to see this terrible evil take place.
It is the duty of all good men and women to spread the word and inform
others of the evil workings of these despotic “leaders”, to try and
prevent this evil from happening and growing. We take a firm stand
against this evil and let the tyrants know we are not the same as them,
we stand with free humanity in love, kindness, liberty and freedom. The
blood is not on our hands, it is on the hands of these evil, sick,
disgusting people that wish to destroy all that is good.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernard_Berelson
Bernard Reuben Berelson (1912–1979) was an American behavioral scientist, known for his work on communication and mass media.
He was a leading proponent of the broad idea of the “behavioral sciences”, a field he saw as including areas such as public opinion.[1] In Chapter 14 of Voting (1954), he enunciated what has become known as Berelson’s paradox on democracy: while classical theories of its success assume voters committed to interest in public life, this fails to correspond with practical politics, while the system itself functions.[2][3]
Berelson wrote a summary entitled The Great Debate on Cultural Democracy regarding the confrontation between mass society theorists and researchers for the media industries. Berelson asserted that the resolution of the debate was simple: just listen to mass communication researchers like himself as they develop useful answers to the issues raised by others.
In recent years a 1969 memo written by Frederick S. Jaffe has been a source of controversy. The memo, written to Berelson while he was head of the Population Council, included a table that summarized many proposals from various sources regarding population control. This table contained proposals such as compulsory abortions and sterilizations, encouraging homosexuality, forcing women to work, and other notions that no one would imagine an organization like Planned Parenthood would be associated with. In point of fact, however, Jaffe’s table was included in a report by a Planned Parenthood official that worked for Jaffe, that said “The report was prepared in behalf of Planned Parenthood’s Population Education Staff Committee as a basis for discussion of and action on the U.S. population problem by the Planned Parenthood national organization.”[7]
Furthermore, just two years later, Berelson and Jaffe would work together on the 1972 Rockefeller Commission Report.[8] Many of the ideas discussed in the memorandum were incorporated into the Rockefeller Report. So, while it is true that Jaffe’s memorandum was primarily for purposes of laying out options for discussion, it is not true that Jaffe, Berelson, or Planned Parenthood, had no intention of acting on those proposals. Critics contend that the value of the memo is in revealing the lengths that population control advocates, including Berelson and Jaffe, were willing to go. The original memorandum is available online.[9]
This rings more true with their agenda that they are rolling out in the Western nations with each day. Their attack on human natural norms like the differences between men and women and their blatant and sadistic targeting of the youth and children to corrupt their perception of gender and biology. They are pushing and promoting to teens, making it trendy for them to get on hormonal drugs and to sterilize themselves.
